Blog

Amendment X: The False Truism

The history of the tenth amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides an insightful look into the fears and concerns shared by the founders of this nation. In the Federalist/Anti-Federalist duel over the nature of the proposed federal government and the Constitution’s ability to both empower and restrain it, some individuals proved more prescient than others in warning about the creature exceeding the powers of its creators and continually assuming new authority.

It was hoped that the plain language of the last amendment in the Bill of Rights would clearly affirm the fidelity with which officials must adhere to the Constitution. Its language is succinct and its meaning clear: any powers not delegated to the federal government are denied it, and thus reserved to the states and to the people.

Interestingly, this amendment has become commonly referred to as a “truism”—a statement which is obviously true, and which provides no new insight or meaning. Examples of truisms are “where there is smoke, there is fire”, “torture is barbaric”, and “abuse of power comes as no surprise”. The Supreme Court stated in 1931, in United States v. Sprague, that the tenth amendment “added nothing to the [Constitution] as originally ratified.” A decade later, they similarly wrote:

(more…)

EduJobs Bill further erodes federalism in Utah

H.R. 1586: Education Jobs and Medicade Assistance Act was signed into law on August 10th.  Many in Utah areBaiting with educationcheering as Gov. Herbert and many state legislators are planning to accept the ‘grant’ money and strings attached to the bill.  Most are not aware of the path this bill took from the House of Representatives through the Senate and finally to Pres. Obama for signature.  Here’s a brief look at the titles and official statements, most recent at the top, provided by OpenCongress.org:

All Bill Titles

  • Popular: Education jobs and Medicaid funding bill.
  • Popular: Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act as introduced.
  • Short: Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2010 as passed house.
  • Short: Airport and Airway Trust Fund Financing Act of 2010 as passed house.
  • Short: Aviation Safety and Investment Act of 2010 as passed house.
  • Short: FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act as passed house.
  • Short: FAA Air Transportation Modernization and Safety Improvement Act as passed senate.
  • Official: An act to modernize the air traffic control system, improve the safety, reliability, and availability of transportation by air in the United States, provide for modernization of the air traffic control system, reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes. as amended by senate.
  • Official: To impose an additional tax on bonuses received from certain TARP recipients. as introduced.

In typical spaghetti bowl approach the national government has found a way to tie three seemingly different areas into a single bill easily marketed as a way to help teachers and children across the country.  Who would not want to help teachers and children?  Especially since the money is granted from the national government and the states need this help (most states anyway as there are some states fully funding their education needs).

Yet, where is the $10 billion coming from?  We have to go through the bill to find “Title 1, Subtitle A, Section 101, (d) Rescission of Unobligated Balances- Of the amounts authorized under obligated for necessary expenses for an Education Jobs Fund, $10,000,000,000: Provided, That the amount under this heading shall be administered under the terms and conditions of sections 48103 and 48112 of title 49, United States Code, for fiscal year 2009, $305,500,000 are hereby rescinded.”  Clear?  If not you can read further clarifications under SEC. 116. IMPACTS ON AIRPORTS OF ACCOMMODATING CONNECTING PASSENGERS. The heart of the details are actually further down under Subsection C, Section121 that covers “UPDATE ON OVERFLIGHTS.”  Good luck!

Where is the money coming from?  According to The Washington Post article, “[t]he bill includes nearly $10 billion in new taxes on U.S. multinational corporations that do business abroad, and it rescinds after 2014 an increase in food stamp payments enacted in last year’s $862 billion stimulus package.”  Yes, the additional money for temporary relief for education will eventually come, partially, by reducing food stamp payments, but that’s not until 2014 and states get the money for education today.

“It would be foolish for the State of Utah not to accept this funding, which will directly benefit Utah’s schoolchildren…I am committed to fiscal responsibility, and will continue to demand it here in Utah,” Herbert said. “But I will not put ideology before Utah’s schoolchildren.”

It was further pointed out the money was reallocated from other areas so it is not new money.  The Utah House Speaker, Rep. David Clark, told a GOP Caucus meeting there are holes in the budget this money can be used to fill.  The marketing efforts of the national government are quite successful in stopping ideology in its track.  Don’t be foolish, take the money or it will be forced upon you anyway.

Ideology is defined many ways, especially political ideology.  Mirriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary offers the following;

1: visionary theorizing
2 a: a systematic body of concepts especially about human life or culture b: a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture c: the integrated assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program

This is a word that came into use after our Framers and Founders provided the unique principles of federalism.  The assertions, theories, and aims of federalism created a firestorm of debate around the globe.  Prior to 1789 no society had been designed with the ideological focus of self-governing by the people with life, liberty, and property being governed at the lowest level possible with states being the top level.  The visionary aspects can be found in the six goals of the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution:

Bill of RightsWe the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Federalism in Utah has been a real talking point over the past couple of years.  Many feel this principle is fundamentally required for our Constitution and our federalist republic to survive.  Move from this principle and we move from a system of governing that secures the blessing of liberty to one that promotes centralized planning and a more tyrannical approach required under any centralized model of governing.  It is this principle, federalism, which is put at risk once again by our national government’s insistence that states take the money provided under H.R. 1586.  But according to state school superintendent Larry Shumway the principle simply has no hold in this discussion.

ABC 4 reporter Don Hudson interviewed Shumway and as part of the interview he stated, “There is a provision that requires the secretary to allocate the money. And if one state doesn’t take it – he has to give the money to somebody. So, if we said, as a state, we are going to stand on principle and we won’t take the money – the money is going to be spent somewhere. That’s in the law.”  The law trumps principle, federalism loses.  The pesky thing about principles is if we rationalize around them often enough they become meaningless.  Federalism is quickly becoming meaningless and as it dies so dies our form of society which brought us the liberty we use to hold dear.

In Felix Morley’s Freedom and Federalism he writes;

I further came to realize that the outstanding virtue of federalism, which is the distinctly American contribution to political art, is its facility in combing these antagonistic conditions (order and freedom).  Since the reconciliation of freedom and order is anything but easy a federal system requires both complicated governmental machinery and a high degree of interest and understanding among its citizens.  These factors make federalism a distinctly experimental system, especially vulnerable in periods of upheaval. (pg. xxiv)

Herbert, Davis and others do not mind supporting resolutions or legislation emphasizing federalism when it is easy but when it gets tough, teachers and children after all will ‘lose’ and the dollars will be spent anyway, it takes a back seat.  This is a period of upheaval after all.  Upheaval is today a constant in our governing world.  As for this latest bribe toward centralization it does not matter the funds are temporary.  When they run out where will the state get the money moving forward?  Perhaps next time it will come from new money or another round of redistributed money from the FAA.  Maybe we will need another form of emergency spending of dollars our children’s children will have to pay.  Further reductions from Peter so that Paul may benefit while ideology gets moved from the back seat to the garage, tucked away in a box we will not open again.

The cycle will continue as the national grip over states becomes so strong there will be no stopping it, ideology be damned.  Federalism is not a part-time approach to freedom.  Our choice is not about taking money for schools today but stopping the cycle of nationalized education and centralized planning.  The marketers sell us a different product but this ‘as seen on TV’ product does not work, we must stop buying it at some point or give in to the fact we don’t have the “high degree of interest and understanding” Morley reminds us is necessary.

How could we possibly uphold federalism and still support our teachers and children?  Under federalism Utah can access the resources locked away by national government intrusion.  You can learn about this by reviewing the H.B. 143: Eminent Domain Authority.  State resources far exceeding the national government’s dollars are available but we don’t demand them as loudly as we demand our politicians take the money from the EduBills Act today.

It is not easy to understanding, simply look at the structure of the legislation to discover our political parties don’t want it to be.  Track the logic of funding education needs by a bill summarized as “[a]n act to modernize the air traffic control system, improve the safety, reliability, and availability of transportation by air in the United States, provide for modernization of the air traffic control system, reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.”

What can we do? First and foremost study our heritage and decide if you want federalism to be the ideology thatUtah Flagguides our posterity or not.  If you don’t then it does not matter if elected officials only support it part of the time, it will die soon enough.  If you support the ideology that should guide our posterity you will need to be involved with a high degree of interest and understanding.  Involved in this issue means you will want to sign the petition “Utahn’s Against Fiscal Meltdown” (check back for active link coming soon) and explain to your representatives we must uphold the principle of federalism ALL the time; when it is easy and when it is difficult, even as difficult as the EduJobs Bill makes it.

Passing the Baton

We’ve got some exciting plans here in Utah for how to reassert and reinforce the 10th amendment, and are looking forward to expanding our volunteer base and organizational structure to make that happen. With the excellent foundation that Gary Wood has laid so far as State Coordinator, starting today I’ll now be filling that role (and Gary’s big shoes). Gary will be our Educational Advisor and we’re really looking forward to his continued input and direction in helping us make more Utahns aware of the importance of the 10th amendment.

Perhaps a brief bio would be beneficial. I’m a long-time advocate and defender of the U.S. Constitution and the 10th amendment specifically, having argued through various mediums the need for states to assert their sovereignty and chain down the federal government. I’m mostly known for my blog, but also use Facebook, Twitter, and other networks to spread the message. Most recently, I founded the Utah Nullification Project to raise money and buy a copy of Tom Woods’ new book for every Utah state legislator. Our hope is that these public servants read/skim the material and better understand the history of and present need for nullification. (We’re almost to our goal, so donate today if you’re able!)

I’m really excited to take the reigns now for the Tenth Amendment Center here in Utah, and hope that we can all work together to find the best and most effective way of standing up to the federal government and retaining our rights. If you have any ideas as we move forward, or would like to volunteer in whatever capacity you feel most capable in, please contact me so we enhance our efforts and be successful!

My thanks again to Gary for his impressive work so far. Let’s make the rest of 2010 a great year for the 10th amendment!

Do we want representatives pulled into line?

According to Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) those members of his faction , the Democratic Party, most likely to be defeated in 2010 are the very members difficult to pull into party line.   As reported in a recent article in The Hill Waxman was very clear on why he believes many will lose their seat in Congress this coming election actually referring to weeding out difficult Democrats.  This line of thinking is critical to understanding the root problem we face under a governing standard based on the rule of law resting with the people.

Quoting the Berman and Hooper article, “I think a lot of the House seats we’re going to lose are those who have been the toughest for the Democrats to pull into line — the Democrats that have been the most difficult,” Waxman said.  When we understand the job of the Majority or Minority Whip as the person responsible for whipping faction members into line with the rest of the party it is not surprising someone with as long a career as Waxman has had feels these Democrats are difficult.  He is not alone as a believer in party members serving in Congress for the benefit of the party rather than the people.

A former U.S. Senator from Illinois provides an even clearer understanding of how things work.  In the article a story is told that quotes President Obama as saying the following to a wavering Democrat,  “[y]ou’ve got to fight for what you want to do here, and then you’ve got to fight to get elected, and convince your constituents that this is what is in their interest and it’s important.”  Consider this approach to running our Congress.

Under the initial concept of federalism the House of Representatives was to be the people’s house.  Directly elected by the people, representatives understood what their constituents wanted as the representative came from the people represented.  There was no whip or party leadership inside the halls of our Legislative Branch to pull into line different members of their faction.  More importantly there was no need for the representative to tow a factional line and return home to ‘convince’ their constituents something was in their best interest even if it was something they did not openly or collectively embrace.

Although this brief look into the minds of career, factional politicians gives us an idea of how things work on both sides of the aisle is it the way we want it to work?  Self-government at the lowest level, based on the fundamental principles of federalism, should not be subjected to such party bullying.  Our representatives should not have to go to Congress and face party leadership inside the halls of government.  However, as long as the people do not awaken to these accepted traditions of bully politics it will continue.

Over the past century, since the party caucus of the democrats and republicans has been in place, whips have not secured freedom.  Instead the tradition has not only poisoned representative democracy in the national level house, the same structure and abuse has been adopted in every state legislative branch as well.  At some point we must decide if we are sending people to be pulled, like some well cooked pork, or to represent the people rather than the strongest faction.iHill

Federalism and the 10th Amendment

March of Liberty Radio Logo

Saturday’s ‘Freedom is Rising’ show, on August 14th, focused on federalism and the 10th Amendment.

We are going to begin exploring the ideals we are losing in our dialog today. Federalism, what is it? In the beginning what was understood to be our Federal Government? How important was the 10th Amendment in this new experiment?  It is a critically important time in our history where we must restore the dialog, control the proper vocabulary, help restore federalism.  Support our states’ efforts to interpose between the ever oppressive national government, operating outside of their enumerated powers, and citizens who still control our government should we stand united.

Tune in every week for both the Saturday and Sunday show.  Saturday is focused on education of the Constitution.  The Sunday show is focused on news of the day, economics, and what the impact is without following the Constitution.  Both air at 7pm EST.  During each live show you can join in the conversation using the chat room (simply register free at BTR) and call in to 347-326-9311.   See you on the radio!

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/March-of-Liberty